Quantcast
Channel: Topics in Category: General help - Modelio forum
Viewing all 1298 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Subject: Re: edition of invariants - by: ebr

January 6, 2014, 5:01 am
$
0
0
Hi jmfavre,

Concerning the displaying of invariants (or constraint in general), being able to change would be nice and unfortunatly it is not possible now and as far as I know nothing is planned for this...
A workaround would be to work with a new type of note created under a stereotype.

Concerning the edition of invariant name, I aggree that the actual behavior seems a little bit weird, right now the best option would be to edit them thanks to the element tab.

Hoping it helps,

EBR
↧
Search

Subject: Re: Unmasking "Class Association"? - by: chm

January 6, 2014, 5:33 am
$
0
0
Hi,

as far as I understand, you're missing the ClassAssociation itself in the Model view. Drag & drop of it should unmask everything in the diagram, with both Modelio 3.0.1 or 3.1...



Hope this helps,


chm
↧
↧

Subject: E205: The BpmnMessageFlow *Deleted*' element is an orphan: it has no container. - by: grafvonb

January 18, 2014, 1:34 am
$
0
0
When I try to connect two elements e.g. throwing message event and catching message event placed in two different pools/lanes using message flow (a very standard scenario in BPMN) I always get this error. I can't connect just two pools (treated as collapsed) either. It seem to be a bug. Help. Modelio 3.1.
↧

Subject: Re: Unmasking "Class Association"? - by: jmfavre

January 19, 2014, 12:46 pm
$
0
0
Thanks, this is exacly what I was looking for. In fact I didn't tried to open the relation because in the standard a Class Association is really one metamodel element, not two or two, so one cannot display it in "pieces". I guess that this way to model Class Association is to simplify and stay with simple inheritance in the metamodel. Anyway, this is just this solve my pronlem. Cool.
↧

Subject: Re: edition of invariants - by: jmfavre

January 19, 2014, 12:53 pm
$
0
0
Thanks for your answer. Yes, I used notes as the support is better for the display. In fact, I guess that the separation between notes and constraints is some kind of legacy, because with note types, the need for constraints is not clear. As far as I can see the benefit of constraints is that they can be associated with various model elements, while notes have to be attached to one model element, but this this could be changed.
Thanks for you answer
Jean-marie
↧
↧

Subject: Re: E205: The BpmnMessageFlow *Deleted*' element is an orphan: it has no container. - by: cde

January 20, 2014, 6:54 am
$
0
0
Hi grafvonb,

I cannot reproduce your problem...

Can you provide your 3.1.0 project so we can investigate ?

You can use your favourite online storage service and send me the url using the Private Message feature.

Best regards,
cde.
↧

Subject: how to startup modelio with BPNM - by: arobredo

January 23, 2014, 7:58 am
$
0
0
I downloaded software, windows 7, pC. software works great but I cannot get to the BPNM profile or get a project started in BPNM only UML. Any help on configuration? Did I do something different other than install? thanks
↧

Subject: Re: how to startup modelio with BPNM - by: andy

January 23, 2014, 8:14 am
$
0
0
Hi,

You don't need any configuration. BPMN is there by default.

Just open a project and add a BPMN diagram.

For example: Right-click on package -> Create Diagram -> Create BPMN Process ...
↧
Search

Subject: Height of class header in vesion 3.1 - by: sloo

January 27, 2014, 4:46 am
$
0
0
Hi all,
first, I'm using Modelio mainly to prepare diagrams for documentation purposes. For this reason, good looking diagrams are important for me.
I recently installed version 3.1 and recognized that class headers are now less high: there is less space between the name and the upper and lower border of the class header compartment. (I'm not talking about the adjustable symbol size, but about the fixed height of the header compartment.) Beside the fact that I preferred the older style, I now have the problem that my various diagramms look different. Is there a possibility to adjust this height?

Thanks, Stefan
↧
↧

Subject: Re: How to hide attribute types in a class (diagram) - by: marco.sm

January 27, 2014, 5:25 am
$
0
0
+1 for this feature.

Sometimes, if you want to sketch a quick class diagram, specifying the type of each attribute is not needed and, setting "none" as default, it would be nice to have the type hidden.

Regards,
Marco
↧

Subject: Re: Height of class header in vesion 3.1 - by: pan

January 28, 2014, 1:35 am
$
0
0
Hi sloo,

You can post an new issue here in order to follow its resolution.

Currently, there is no way to change the class header height.

BR
↧

Subject: Editor tabs placement resets - by: modeliof2

January 29, 2014, 2:12 am
$
0
0
Hello,


i am evaluating modelio as a UML modeling tool for my projects, especially since i am already familiar with eclipse.

One problem seems to persist though, and i dont know how to solve it:

I want to change the placement of the editor tabs, e.g. have split-screen of the model main editor and the elements-tab. Below that i want the rest of the editor tabs.



Setting this up is no problem. However, every time i restart the program, the placement of the tabs is reset to its default (element tab is back in the bottom part)

Is there any way to persist the placement of the tabs?
↧

Subject: Generic operation parameters - by: modeliof2

January 29, 2014, 3:27 am
$
0
0
Hi,


i am trying to add a generic parameter to a function in a class diagram. Like this:




It doesnt necessarily have to be an own Vector clas, i'd also be happy to use a List implementation, like ArrayList.

I've tried pretty much everything, but couldn't model this simple generic scenario. Is it possible to do that? How?


Thanks for any answers!
↧
↧

Subject: Re: Editor tabs placement resets - by: ebr

January 29, 2014, 4:07 am
$
0
0
Hi,

It seems to be an Modelio 3.x issue, please post a new entry here in order to follow its resolution.

Regards,

EBR
↧

Subject: Re: Editor tabs placement resets - by: modeliof2

January 29, 2014, 6:06 am
$
0
0
Thanks for the quick reply. I opened a new issue. (already got assigned to a developer)


Great support!
↧
Search

Subject: Re: Generic operation parameters - by: pan

January 29, 2014, 9:12 am
$
0
0
Hi,

In a class diagram, you cannot display the generic parameters form.
It is specific to some languages like JavaDesigner.

You can do it from your model:
- create a Parameter 'elements' on an operation with the type Vector
- On the parameter, go to the Java tab and change the Template Binding property



Hope this helps
↧

Subject: Re: Generic operation parameters - by: cma

January 30, 2014, 2:03 am
$
0
0
Hello,

The easiest way to do this is to write your java file then reverse it into Modelio.

The second way is to:

- create your method and parameter
- go to the "Element" tab
- choose the "UML" section
- set the parameter type to the "string" default UMl type
- set the minimum cardinality to 0
- set the maximum cardinality to *

The java module will then generate:



You may change the type of the collection in the "Collection" field of the "Java" tab.
↧
↧

Subject: How to maintain same xmi IDs in modelio XMI exports? - by: lvelarde

January 31, 2014, 5:01 am
$
0
0
Does anyone know if Modelio supports this functionality...?

Each time a Modelio package in a model is exported via XMI, new xmi:IDs (Identifiers)for each element are generated.

Example

1st export from a model yielded...
<packagedElement xmi:type="uml:Actor" xmi:id="_ND58PYpvEeO-iq5OQSO5Og" name="Requirements Coordinator">

2nd export from same Modelio model yielded...
<packagedElement xmi:type="uml:Actor" xmi:id="_5uEAqIdsEeOJD-MUNg8lgw" name="Requirements Coordinator">

Is there a way to avoid this regeneration and preserve one set of identifiers?

This is possible in IBM® Rational® Software Architect. (See bullet 5 in link below)

pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/rsarthlp/v8r5...opics%2Ftexpmod.html
↧

Subject: Re: How to maintain same xmi IDs in modelio XMI exports? - by: ebr

January 31, 2014, 5:59 am
$
0
0
Hi lvelarde,

Unfortunatly this feature do not exist in Modelio, it could be an usefull feature you can ask for it here.

Regards,

EBR
↧

Subject: How to rename the project root? - by: jmfavre

February 5, 2014, 1:26 pm
$
0
0
Hi,
projects can be renamed, package can be renamed, but it seems impossible to rename the root of a project.

This name is in project.conf and in a few files where the fragments are declared, but is there a better way to do this renaming?

Is it safe to make a grep and change the name in the various files? I guess that indexes and other derived files should be rebuild then. How to do this?

Thanks for all kind of information
Jean-Marie
↧
Viewing all 1298 articles
Browse latest View live
Search